From the Mail and Guardian - South Africa
Jacob Zuma's secret nuke 'stitch-up'
·
·
·
As
the government scrambles to limit fallout, we reveal how Jacob Zuma grabbed
control of the R1tn deal and negotiated directly with Vladimir Putin.
President Jacob Zuma personally negotiated a nuclear
deal with his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, say highly placed government
and ANC sources. This ensured that the intergovernmental agreement announced
with fanfare this week took all but his most trusted and intimate inner circle
by surprise.
A senior ANC leader, who Zuma entrusted with intimate
details of the negotiation with Putin, said that Zuma had ironed out details
directly with the Russian president on the sidelines of the Brics (Brazil ,
Russia , India ,
China and South
Africa ) summit in Brazil
in July, and finalised details of the pact during his highly secretive visit to
Moscow last month.
“It was simple. When Zuma came back from Brazil ,
it was done,” the senior ANC leader said.
The party leader and another well-placed ANC MP added
that the details of the deal were finalised during Zuma’s trip to Russia
in August.
The two sources said that Zuma subsequently instructed
energy minister Tina Joemat-Pettersson to sign the deal with the Russians on
the sidelines of the general conference of the International Atomic Energy
Agency (IAEA) in Vienna .
A joint statement issued by the Russian state-owned
nuclear company Rosatom and the South African energy department on Monday said
that the agreement “lays the foundation for the large-scale nuclear power
plants procurement and development programme of South Africa based on the
construction in South Africa of new nuclear power plants with Russian VVER
reactors with total installed capacity of up to 9.6GW (up to eight [reactor]
units)”.
Deputy energy minister Thembisile Majola told
Parliament’s energy portfolio committee, which met on Tuesday, that she had no
knowledge of the nuclear deal and had first learned of it through the media.
The chairperson of the committee, Fikile Majola, said
that he would call Joemat-Pettersson to explain herself to the committee. “We
want her to tell us the details surrounding the deal,” he said.
Shrouded in secrecy
Sources also said that the minister and Zuma did not take the ANC’s national executive committee (NEC) into their confidence over the matter. Four NEC members independently said that there was no mention of an impending nuclear agreement withRussia
at last weekend’s meeting.
Sources also said that the minister and Zuma did not take the ANC’s national executive committee (NEC) into their confidence over the matter. Four NEC members independently said that there was no mention of an impending nuclear agreement with
One added that some senior party figures were
unimpressed that Zuma, instead of resting in Russia
as initially planned, had negotiated deals that had not been agreed to by the
leadership. He said Zuma only gave details of the deal to his most trusted
Cabinet ministers and MPs.
This week’s announcement also startled politically
connected nuclear lobbyists and industry insiders, some of whom frantically
exchanged calls in a bid to understand its significance.
A respected nuclear industry leader said the statement
looked “pretty definitive”, and news that Russia
had clinched a deal to build nuclear reactors blazed unchecked across radio and
television bulletins, as well as social media.
The announcement was followed by an apparent damage
control exercise. A rival to Rosatom said that they had received written
assurances on Tuesday morning from a leading member of the South African delegation
to the IAEA conference in Vienna
that “there will be other intergovernmental agreements signed with the other
vendors before the procurement process will start”.
A new statement issued solely by the department of
energy on Tuesday evening said that the agreement “initiates the preparatory
phase for the procurement for the new nuclear build programme”.
“Similar agreements are foreseen with other vendor
countries that have expressed an interest in supporting South
Africa in this massive programme,” it said.
“Joemat-Pettersson will lead a delegation to visit France ,
where bilateral discussions will culminate with the signing of a co-operation
agreement between the two countries [and] the South African government is also
in discussions towards concluding an intergovernmental agreement with the
Chinese government.”
But Zuma’s personal involvement with Putin means that even if similar agreements are concluded with other states, the Russians must be considered clear frontrunners.
Rosatom
told the Mail & Guardian that Monday’s joint statement was
“intended to solely serve as information on the agreement and not necessarily
position Rosatom as a preferred bidder”.
“The agreement stipulates the overall development of
various fields of nuclear power industry, and supplementary agreements will be
signed in each field stipulating all details,” added a spokesperson.
Senior government and industry sources have been
telling amaBhungane for the past 18 months that Zuma has taken a personal
interest in the government’s planned procurement of 9?600 megawatts (an
estimated R1-trillion’s worth) of nuclear power, regarding it as one of his
“presidential legacy projects”.
A senior government official said that Zuma and Putin
made initial strides towards a nuclear deal at the Brics summit in Durban in
March 2013, but hammered out the details during Zuma’s working visit to the
Russian Black Sea resort of Sochi in May last year.
The M&G reported that Zuma had slipped into
the driver’s seat the following month, replacing his deputy at the time,
Kgalema Motlanthe, as chair of the national nuclear energy executive
co-ordinating committee.
A month later, Zuma replaced energy minister Dipuo
Peters with Ben Martins, in a move widely seen as being intended to tighten
control over the nuclear procurement process and tie up a deal with the
Russians.
Joemat-Pettersson took over from Martins in May this
year.
Draft agreement
According to the official, a draft nuclear co-operation agreement began to circulate between the Russians and the South Africans in July last year. Initiated by the Russians, this apparently sought a commitment from the South Africans to deal exclusively with them. It allegedly contained four clauses that particularly alarmed South African government officials. They included:
According to the official, a draft nuclear co-operation agreement began to circulate between the Russians and the South Africans in July last year. Initiated by the Russians, this apparently sought a commitment from the South Africans to deal exclusively with them. It allegedly contained four clauses that particularly alarmed South African government officials. They included:
·
Limiting South
Africa to acquiring Russian reactor
technology;
·
Giving Russia
exclusive say over the auxiliary construction contracts;
·
Giving Russia
a 20-year veto on South Africa
doing business with any other nuclear vendor countries; and
·
Making South
Africa exclusively liable for all nuclear
equipment procured from Russia
as soon as it left that country.
“These clauses either flouted sections of our
Constitution, which guarantees an open, competitive and transparent bidding processes,
or they were not in our national interest,” said the source.
The Russians were said to have pushed “aggressively”
for the signing of the agreement, first at the G20 summit in St Petersburg in
September last year and again before the Atomex nuclear conference, hosted by
Rosatom, in Johannesburg in November. But South African concerns about the
proposed exclusivity and liability clauses are said to have stymied an
agreement.
At the two-day G20 summit, South African and Russian
officials were unable to agree on key clauses in the nuclear co-operation
treaty, including those relating to its financing.
The M&G has
learned reliably that Zuma summoned then finance minister Pravin Gordhan, who
had accompanied him to the summit, to a meeting and appealed to him for the
necessary financial commitments. Gordhan apparently declined and warned Zuma
such a step would be unwise.
Gordhan could not be reached for confirmation on
Thursday.
Initial agreement
In October last year, ANC secretary general Gwede Mantashe and treasurer general Zweli Mkhize accompanied a delegation of ANC-aligned businesspeople from the Progressive Business Forum on a four-day visit to Russia. The ANC signed a memorandum of understanding withRussia ’s
ruling United Russia party.
In October last year, ANC secretary general Gwede Mantashe and treasurer general Zweli Mkhize accompanied a delegation of ANC-aligned businesspeople from the Progressive Business Forum on a four-day visit to Russia. The ANC signed a memorandum of understanding with
The M&G has previously reported that, before
the Atomex conference, Russian state-owned media claimed a nuclear reactor deal
was a fait accompli. News agency RIA Novosti reported as fact that Rosatom “are
to build eight nuclear electricity units in South
Africa . Formal agreements about this are to
be signed … on the fringes of Atomex”.
But what was released at Atomex was a memorandum of
understanding between Rosatom and the South African Nuclear Energy Corporation.
A protester in front of a Rosatom building in
Martins promised at the time that a co-operation
agreement would be signed early this year, pending the finalisation of “legal
procedures”.
After Atomex, a source said energy department
officials had stopped answering Rosatom’s calls, suggesting that the Russians
had overstepped the mark or that major South African government decisions were
then placed on hold until after this year’s elections.
After the May poll, Zuma removed Martins, who had held
the position for less than a year, and replaced him with Joemat-Pettersson.
Presidential loyalty
Several M&G and amaBhungane sources said that she was seen as being more loyal to the president than her predecessors and more likely to deliver the outcome required on the nuclear deal.
Several M&G and amaBhungane sources said that she was seen as being more loyal to the president than her predecessors and more likely to deliver the outcome required on the nuclear deal.
It is not clear whether the agreement signed on Monday
differs materially from the draft haggled over by the Russians and South
Africans last year.
Xolile Mabhongo, a member of the South African
government delegation to Vienna ,
told Business Day on Thursday that the veto clause had been removed from the
signed agreement. He also said that the text of the new agreement would not be
made public.
But the announcement reveals the Russians have finally
managed to get South Africans to put pen to paper, stretching their lead in the
race for the trillion-rand nuclear tender.
Presidential
spokesperson Mac Maharaj did not respond to questions. – Additional
reporting by Sarah Wild & Pauli van Wyk
Qaanitah Hunter is an M&G political reporter and Lionel Faull
is an investigator with the M&G Centre for Investigative Journalism.
Long and winding road to a
nuclear nation
Politically, South
Africa and Russia
seem determined to get a nuclear build deal done with unseemly haste. But there
are many obstacles to it becoming a reality.
Before South
Africa can start building nuclear power
plants, Parliament must ratify every step of the process, from the broad country-to-country
agreement down to the allocation of money.
Two regulators, those for electricity pricing and
nuclear power respectively, must sign off on specific details, and they are
bound by their own statutes and rules on fairness and justifiability. The flow
of vast sums of money to foreign suppliers, and the accompanying currency
hedges, are subject to financial regulations.
There are stringent local requirements for
environmental impact assessments and consultations with the communities
involved (Bantamsklip and Duinefontein in the Western
Cape and Thyspunt in the Eastern
Cape are currently proposed sites for the nuclear
stations).
The fairness of tenders – to bidders, but also the
citizens ultimately doing the buying – is a constitutional imperative, giving
the courts broad powers to review processes if an interested party cries
foul.
Nuclear build and the manufacture and transport of
nuclear fuel are subject to a tangle of international agreements on
nonproliferation and safety. South Africa
has agreed to adhere to the International Atomic Agency’s 19 milestones for a
nuclear build, an anomaly for a country that has an existing nuclear
programme.
They include securing the money to deal with nuclear
waste and the decommissioning of the power plants decades down the line, and
having a human resources plan to make sure there are enough skilled people to
run the proposed fleet.
The guidelines also include a very practical
(not to mention time-consuming and expensive) requirement about upgrading the electricity
grid to deal with the start-up requirements and output of the new nuclear
stations.
Early this month, as the United
States and the European Union moved to
impose sanctions against Russia
because of the conflict in the Ukraine ,
Russian nuclear company Rosatom argued that politics should play no part in
decisions on nuclear energy. With safety and enormous sums of money involved,
the company said “temporary disagreements” between countries should not be a
factor.
Between
1998, when South Africa
started considering new nuclear build, and 2007, when Jacob Zuma ousted Thabo
Mbeki as ANC leader, Russia
was not considered a serious contender for any contracts. – Sarah
Wild & Phillip de Wet
DA demands full disclosure
The Democratic Alliance said on Thursday that it has
applied for full access to all the documents relating to the nuclear
deal.
It said that under the Promotion of Access to
Information Act, it would demand sight of everything related to the decision to
co-operate with Russia ’s
Rosatom State Atomic Energy Corporation on the new nuclear fleet, including the
minutes of the interministerial committee on energy security chaired by
President Jacob Zuma.
The party has also written to the parliamentary
oversight committee on energy, requesting that it subpoena Energy Minister Tina
Joemat-Pettersson to appear before it and produce a copy of the full agreement
with Rosatom, and to clarify Rosatom’s statements.
DA leader Helen Zille said that the “extraordinary and
unprecedented” situation where both Rosatom and the department of energy issued
identical statements made it clear that there was a deal to develop nuclear
programmes in “South Africa
driven by Rosatom and the Russian government”.
Despite the department trying to reinterpret the
statement retrospectively, “one can hardly believe that they would have issued
the first statement, which is the identical version of Rosatom statement, if
there wasn’t some validity to it”.
She said there had been speculation for many months
about a secret deal being reached between Zuma and Russian President Vladimir
Putin concerning the nuclear programme, which will cost an estimated
R1-trillion and have to be paid for by generations to come.
“We have
been very badly burned as a society in the past and with all the secrecy that
surrounds this particular deal, we are absolutely determined to get to the
bottom of it,” Zille said. – Andisiwe Makinana
Lionel is a reporter at the
Mail & Guardian Centre for Investigative Journalism, Amabhungane.
No comments:
Post a Comment